2015年1月10日 星期六

Writing about Visual Arts in Constructionist Way

Source: Wyrich, J. (2014). Steps to Writing Well: writing about Visual Arts. 

To begin with suggestions for analyzing paintings, preparing for your viewing requires taking detailed notes on what you see and have a picture for latter reference. Note your first impressions. What this article author suggests us to do is never trust our ability to memorize. Especially our first impression, we usually remember little pieces of our feeling and it tends to be too vague so we need to write it down right after we see the picture (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Suggestions for analyzing paintings.

Basic information about the picture should include the name of the painting, the artist, the date and place, the artist particular purpose, and the style of painting. Those pieces of information are all important because they will potentially influence what readers’ point of view. The background of the picture could help readers understand the picture more easily. However, it might affect readers’ comments on the picture because of the height of the artist’s reputation or the popularity of the style, which makes the comment too subjective (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Suggestions for analyzing paintings-record basic information.

        When studying the subject matter, we should mention people, places, animal, objects, designs, and the most intelligent part, abstract confluences of shapes and colors in the picture. Analyzing a picture isn't an easy job without deep observations. The artist’s elements to express his intention often cover in the shapes, colors, and lines (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Study the subject matter.

        A portrait serves as the representation of a particular person. His or her facial expressions, angle of the body, clothing, and accessories might imply power, superiority, gentleness, aloofness, boredom, innocence or social class. These elements will all construct the main point of view of the 
artist (Figure 4).
  Figure 4. A portrait as part of subject matter.

As for a landscape, we are suggested to do the research about whether the artist is inviting viewers to enjoy the beauty in the picture, or in contrast the artist want to express paradise lost?  Are elements such as crossroads and storm used symbolically? Why are those people depicted in the picture? Purpose must hide in those elements. That’s why Steps to Writing Well suggests that we put emphasize on them (Figure 5). 
Figure 5. A landscape as the subject matter.

    The last suggestions for analyzing paintings is if possible, identify the painting’s period style or “school” (Figure 6). Take Monet’s The Water Lily Pond as an example. Variation of the colors and lights are used in the picture. This kind of style in nineteenth century is called Impressionism. 
Figure 6. If possible, identify the painting’s period style or “school.”

        What Wyrick, J.(2014), the editor of this writing encyclopedia Steps to Writing Well, suggest us to do is actually write in the style of constructionism. Every element is utilized to construct the artist’s point of view and his intention to express his thoughts. It is a clear and helpful way to adopt Wyrich’s suggestions. With his suggestions, an essay about visual arts would be complete and impressive. 



2015年1月5日 星期一

Come out from The Castle

In the second meeting with Professor Liang, she told me that I am now supposed to be a messenger/ mediator between the residents in Chung Hsing New Village “Castle” and people who don’t live in it. Professor mentioned during French Revolution, Louis XVI and his wife were killed by rebels under an inconceivable situation. They used to live in a beautiful and peaceful environment. Although messengers told them the emergency outside their castle, nothing was reversed. What I am playing is the role of the messenger. I should be the bridge from interior castle to outside world. I need to clarify the reality; otherwise I could not save the people inside the castle.

Professor suggested that I force myself to face the ugly blooded side of the reality such as relationship between industrial developments and environment and that I do the research on difference of environmental standards inside and outside Chung Hsing New Village. The problem of Chung Hsing New Village is usage of the land because environment of Chung Hsing New Village is quite different from the one surrounding it. What people outside Chung Hsing New Village think is that Taiwan Provincial Government has lost its function as a political center. The village is now being over protected. What am I going to do is go carefully the plan of National Science Council and specify which part I could surrender and which part I could not. If Central Science Park now has come in, what should it be aware of and pay attention to? What is my bottom line? If Central Science Park stepped on it, what kind of value it would implicate? What is Chung Hsing New Village’s requirement? What should be preserved and what is their value? And my stance toward Central Science Park has change a little bit; perhaps my topic will be change subsequently. I agree with Professor’s suggestions. Until now, my point is still vague because of the swinging stance.


Above is Professor’s suggestion, and then is my classmates’. And one said my previous annotations all took a stand to oppose the coming in of the Advanced Research Park. After reading my annotation 3, she was a little curious about my position now. So maybe I can reemphasize my position after providing the advantages and disadvantages and she thought that would complete my annotation. She popped the question “do you still insist on opposing the establishing of Advanced Research Park?” That’s a good and direct question for me. When completing my whole issue paper, I should put more emphasize on it. Another classmate said the government may really want to help the residents, not only for their own interests. She thought I could talk about what the residents really need and how government can help them. I agree with them. What am I going to do is clarify and specify my position, coming out from the castle where I grow up in order to protect my hometown. 

2014年12月17日 星期三

What is a Good Advanced Research Park supposed to be equipped with?

Two of the opposite sounds against advanced research park are about how will the organization of Chung Hsing New Village become and how will wastes made by the research park be treated now and after the expansion of the research park. This annotation takes a biomedical research park in UK, Granta Park, as an example. Granta Park’s environment is similar as Chung Hsing New Village’s. The article is going to show you to what extent a high-quality advanced research park should be organized and managed.
Granta Park is located in Cambridge Science Park, East of British Kingdom. Granta Park is ideally positioned within the Cambridge Science Cluster, UK's leading region for biosciences, and benefits from excellent access by road and rail due to its South Cambridge location. Operated and managed by Incorporated Granta Park Inc., the Park has not only maintained a high standard of environmental protection and sustainability, but also possessed an effective assets and liabilities management, providing continuous growth and innovation to itself since 1996. With over 250 biotech companies, 100 medical technology companies and 370 service companies support the life science sector. This region is home to the most mature and successful cluster of biotechnology and life science companies in Europe.
One of the characteristics of Granta Park is in terms of scenery design, building form and service provision. Another characteristic is that Granta Park is managed by incorporations. Granta Park utilizes capitals to manage all the developments and services as well as takes the responsibility for them. Along River Granta is an 80- acre land which provides wide roads and parking place. It owns a lake, meadowland, 20-acre forest land and a cricket field. Pavements consist of trees. Cycle lane and semi-rural environment offers a high-quality working space. Also, Granta Park gives vehicles safety of transportation with single exit and proficient surveillance system. Center of management also puts a lot of effort on scenery and building design. Besides, Granta Park devotes to maintaining and reconstructing the static natural animal habitats. Granta Park’s buildings are constructed in simple subject matters in order not to confront the original styles of landscape.
As for eco-friendly request from biomedical park, it has extremely specific standard of the emission of exhaust fumes and water. Most of wastes are restored in special containers. Afterwards, they will be sent to businesses which are professional at waste treatment. In UK, incorporations are all very clear about the rules and never violate them.
In conclusion, if imitating the organization and management of Granta Park, Chung Hsing New Village’s landscape destruction and exhaust pollution would not be a problem. Instead, it would be a lovely friendly living environment.
Reference

Ma, W.Y. (2003). Inspecting facility construction and managing mode of a bio-medical park in UK. International Official Affairs Report. Retrieved from http://report.nat.gov.tw/ReportFront/report_detail.jspx?sysId=C09204030

2014年12月10日 星期三

What are a Good Advanced Research Park Supposed to be Equipped with?

Two of the opposite sounds against advanced research park are about how will the organization of Chung Hsing New Village become and how will wastes made by the research park be treated now and after the expansion of it. This annotation takes an biomedical research park in UK, Granta Park, as an example. Granta Park’s environment is similar as Chung Hsing New Village’s. It is going to show you to what extent a high-quality advanced research park should be organized and managed.
Granta Park is located in Cambridge Science Park, East of British Kingdom. Granta Park is ideally positioned within the Cambridge Science Cluster, UK's leading region for biosciences, and benefits from excellent access by road and rail due to its South Cambridge location. Operated and managed by Incorporated Granta Park Inc., the Park has not only maintained a high standard of environmental protection and sustainability, but also possessed an effective assets and liabilities management, providing continuous growth and innovation to itself since 1996. With over 250 biotech companies, 100 medical technology companies and 370 service companies supporting the life science sector this region is home to the most mature and successful cluster of biotechnology and life science companies in Europe.
One of the characteristics of Granta Park is in terms of scenery design, building form and service provision. Another characteristic is that Granta Park is managed by incorporations. Granta Park utilizes capitals to manage all the developments and services as well as takes the responsibility for them. Along River Granta is an 80- acre land which provides wide roads and parking place. It owns a lake, meadowland, 20-acre forest land and a cricket field. Pavements consist of trees. Cycle lane and semi-rural environment offers a high-quality working space. Also, Granta Park give vehicles safety of transportation with single exit and proficient surveillance system. Center of management also puts a lot of effort on scenery and building design. Besides, Granta Park devotes to maintaining and reconstructing the static natural animal habitats. Granta Park’s buildings are constructed in simple subject matters in order not to confront the original styles of landscape.
As for eco-friendly request from biomedical park, it has extremely specific standard of the emission of exhaust fumes and water. Most of wastes are restored in special containers. Afterwards, they will be sent to businesses professional at waste treatment. In UK, incorporations are all very clear about the rules and never violate them.
In conclusion, if imitating the organization and management of Granta Park, landscape destruction and exhaust pollution would not be a problem. Instead, it would be a lovely friendly living environment.
Reference

Ma, W.Y. (2003). Inspecting facility construction and managing mode of a bio-medical park in UK. International Official Affairs Report. Retrieved from http://report.nat.gov.tw/ReportFront/report_detail.jspx?sysId=C09204030

Is It Really Awful to Have Advanced Research Park Coming in?

        According to the final report from National Science Council, in order to integrate political resources, the government started to plan the integration of Chung Hsing Village and announced that Chung Hsing New Village as a Advanced Research Park.
Since 2000, Ministry of the Interior referring to the rule of “preservation,” the existing facilities and landscape of humanities should be put into prior consideration of preservation. 
        Cited from the plan of Chung Hsing New Village developing into the Advanced Research Park(2008), the park would plan to be a complex researching park, and would offer enough advantages to encourage and attract industrial and researching activities.
1.          First, through the advanced network and physical facilities, Advanced Research Park would strengthen basic abilities for sustainable technological development. 
2.          Second, the way of management of the park is to practice condense knowledge activities such as creating the cooperative opportunities amongst universities, researching institutions and enterprises, which could be the home to excellent elites.
3.          Advanced Research Park are expected to provide the nodes of corporations between top-level academic researches and innovative development, global technology exchanges, and venues for intellectuals and intelligence exchanges.
4.          It would also sufficiently equipped with vital infrastructures and mutual equipment, stimulating high value-added research development among entire industries.
5.          Advanced Research Park will surely become the home base for high quality living and research environment, as well as a residence abundant with global aspects and log-term goals.

Chung Hsing New Village plays an important role in the history of Taiwan’s development. “Plan of Chung Hsing New Village developing into a Advanced Research Park park” was drafted in order to adjust itself to the changing of environment and the transformation of the whole space. Therefore, before putting resources into it, the government was supposed to recheck the position of redevelopment to insure each investment could produce utmost efficiency.

1.          The park won’t destroy existing urban texture and preserve part of historical buildings as much as possible such as Provincial Building, Taiwan Provincial Administration Information Hall, Library, file center and National History Building, which maintaining original functions and also improve its researching facilities and functions as well as improve the international interaction.
2.          Catering to the development needs from the park, basically Central Science Park will preserve original urban texture and the big facilities in the area. Furthermore, it will reinforce inadequate spatial mechanism in the concept of international village.
3.          The government will preserve one special historical unit as Taiwanese humanities history researching park.
4.          Advanced Research Park would also construct a new mechanism of management, following the international trends emphasizing specifically on research development, without importing industrial production and assembling activities, to ensure the residences a high-quality living environment.

      The Advance Research Park will continually release usable lands and spaces base on the principle of “Construct First, Move then”, that is, the release of lands must be along with the magnitude and stages of overall demands, to rectify the move-out and move-in speeds of original bureaus and newly established institutions, in order to guarantee steady and sustainable development.

Reference
Ministry of Science and Technology (2009). Final Report of Plan of Chung Hsing New Village      as an Advanced Research Park. Retrieved      from http://img5.okgo.tw/chnv/document03.pdf

2014年11月26日 星期三

Is It Really Awful to Have Advanced Research Park Coming in?

According to the final report from National Science Council, in order to integrate political resources, the government started to plan the integration of Chung Hsing Village and announced that Chung Hsing New Village as a Advanced Research Park.
Since 2000, Ministry of the Interior referring to the rule of “preservation,” the existing facilities and landscape of humanities should be put into prior consideration of preservation. 
Cited from the plan of Chung Hsing New Village developing into the Advanced Research Park(2008), the park would plan to be a complex researching park, and would offer enough advantages to encourage and attract industrial and researching activities.
1.          First, through the advanced network and physical facilities, Advanced Research Park would strengthen basic abilities for sustainable technological development. 
2.          Second, the way of management of the park is to practice condense knowledge activities such as creating the cooperative opportunities amongst universities, researching institutions and enterprises, which could be the home to excellent elites.
3.          Advanced Research Park are expected to provide the nodes of corporations between top-level academic researches and innovative development, global technology exchanges, and venues for intellectuals and intelligence exchanges.
4.          It would also sufficiently equipped with vital infrastructures and mutual equipment, stimulating high value-added research development among entire industries.
5.          Advanced Research Park will surely become the home base for high quality living and research environment, as well as a residence abundant with global aspects and log-term goals.

Chung Hsing New Village plays an important role in the history of Taiwan’s development. “Plan of Chung Hsing New Village developing into a Advanced Research Park park” was drafted in order to adjust itself to the changing of environment and the transformation of the whole space. Therefore, before putting resources into it, the government was supposed to recheck the position of redevelopment to insure each investment could produce utmost efficiency.

1.          The park won’t destroy existing urban texture and preserve part of historical buildings as much as possible such as Provincial Building, Taiwan Provincial Administration Information Hall, Library, file center and National History Building, which maintaining original functions and also improve its researching facilities and functions as well as improve the international interaction.
2.          Catering to the development needs from the park, basically Central Science Park will preserve original urban texture and the big facilities in the area. Furthermore, it will reinforce inadequate spatial mechanism in the concept of international village.
3.          The government will preserve one special historical unit as Taiwanese humanities history researching park.
4.          Advanced Research Park would also construct a new mechanism of management, following the international trends emphasizing specifically on research development, without importing industrial production and assembling activities, to ensure the residences a high-quality living environment.

      The Advance Research Park will continually release usable lands and spaces base on the principle of “Construct First, Move then”, that is, the release of lands must be along with the magnitude and stages of overall demands, to rectify the move-out and move-in speeds of original bureaus and newly established institutions, in order to guarantee steady and sustainable development.

Reference
Ministry of Science and Technology (2009). Final Report of Plan of Chung Hsing New Village      as an Advanced Research Park. Retrieved      from http://img5.okgo.tw/chnv/document03.pdf

2014年11月12日 星期三

Reflection (1)

    First of all, I would like to briefly introduce my essays so far and then talk about what teacher commented on my works at a teacher-student conference on November 6, 2014.
    My issue paper’s topic is Industrial Development in Chun Hsing New Village. At the first paragraph I explain the situation Chun Hsing New Village where Central Science Park not only has been built but also plans to expand its territory. In the second paragraph, I emphasizes the importance of Chun Hsing New Village’s awesome organization of buildings and neighborhood. In the third paragraph, I talk more about the detailed things about Central Science Park’s plan and economy. At the fourth paragraph is about the two different sounds about the government’s plan. While the last paragraph is my decision to preserve Chun Hsing New Village. Teacher’s comment about my issue paper is to figure out and focus on a certain issue and thesis such as town’s self-identification, economy, positive community interaction, etc. And later I chose to focus on town’s self-identification.
    My annotation (1)’s topic is Why Should We Preserve Historical Heritage of Chung Hsing New Village? In this essay, I focus on the preservation of Chung Hsing New Village. At the first paragraph, I briefly introduce the plan of preservation. At the second paragraph, I talk about the history of Chung Hsing New Village and the special design of the neighborhood. At the third paragraph, I offer some people’s innovating idea about improving Chung Hsing New Village’s economy with some transformation based on the already existing construction. Also, it would do no harm to the landscape and historical cultural heritages. In my conclusion, Chung Hsing New Village should make more effort on preservation due to its value of heritages. My classmates gave me some suggestions toward my first draft: I can focus on cultural heritage of this village and introduce more features of this culture heritages. I can find more examples of villages that have the same situation as Chung Hsing New Village. And talk about the following question: can economic development and environment protection be balanced?  But there still is comment I don’t really agree such us the suggestion that I consider Chung Hsing New Village and its future value for Taipei City. I don’t really understand whay we should associate them.
    The topic of my second annotation is Cultural Heritage versus Economic Development. At the opening I pop my thesis statement: Cultural Heritage could coexist with economic development. In the second paragraph, I use the example of Taipei Water Park Museum. In my summary, preservation of cultural heritage is not a big deal to condense the economic situation. One of my peer group members suggests me that I could make more positive opinions that support government’s plan against my position. And I agree with that, for so far I only talk about preservation of the village except for the positive sound.
    On the meeting, teacher said that my previous essays are too emotional on my opinion and decision. They are too objective. I only want to fight against the government’s attempt, but haven’t find strong reasons to oppose them. I would be beat easily if the government wants to persuade me to agree with them. Therefore, teacher suggested me that I go find the detailed plan of Central Science Park, and go through it, making deeply research. And my next annotation will about it. I’m suggested to stand on the position right against my original position.